Monday, April 23, 2007

And they call this the news?

This piece was published on Monday, April 23, 2007 by


My cousin thought I must be having anger management issues.

She and her husband Paul had flipped through the satellite dials and settled on the McLaughlin Group on the European edition of CNBC. And there on screen sat four weighty U.S. news commentators, two on the right, two on the left, screaming at each other over the underlying social causes of the tragic, but largely inexplicable Virginia Tech slaughter. In the middle sat the wrinkled and ever-earnest John McLaughlin, the “moderator,” interjecting occasionally to throw another log on the fire.

After four months in the tranquility of Provence, France, where passionate discourse virtually never crosses the line into vitriol, this TV food fight, billed as “public affairs” journalism, ratcheted up my blood pressure.

“How can you watch this crap?” I snapped at my cousin Stephanie. “It’s made-for-TV muck — soap opera, not news.” And with that I stormed out to separate the trash from the recyclables.

By the next morning, we could both laugh about my meltdown. But I was left to wonder just what had pushed my button so hard. It isn’t Steph that I was mad at; it is how far my profession, the news business, has fallen in this era of all-noise, all-the-time. Because no one should mistake 24-7 television with all-news, all-the-time. The McLaughlin Group, after all, is considered relatively refined as food fight journalism goes. It takes on serious issues. Most of its regular and guest commentators are well-established journalists.

Yet it’s format — you scream at me and I’ll scream back — wouldn’t be carried on European news channels, not on the BBC, not on France’s TV5 or even, from what I can tell, on local commercial French television. Television news in Europe may be a bit dull, but content still seems to count. From what I can tell through the barrier of language, political talk shows — and there’s a presidential election going on here — are lively, but still leave the speaker time to finish a sentence. Stories on the news tell not just about France, Iraq and the United States, but also about such places as Albania, Nigeria and Vietnam.

As it turns out, a lot is happening in those places. But I doubt that half of my students in Boston could find them on a map, let alone discuss developments there. And with good reason. The U.S. media spends so much time examining America’s navel that it neither has the time nor inclination to look at the global body politic. (Nor, of course, in this era of profits and consolidation, does it want to spend the money to do so.)

Ironically, in fact, all-news, all-the-time seems to have brought Americans less content and less knowledge of all serious topics, American and foreign, not more. It fills the airwaves and print websites with endless redundancy of information and endless opinion with little context. Consider the findings of a recent report from the Pew Center for the People and the Press. Released in mid-April, it found that, “on average, today’s citizens are about as able to name their leaders, and are about as aware of major news events, as was the public nearly 20 years ago.”

Before, that is, the advent of the Internet and all-noise, all-the-time. A second look suggests that the words “about as able” paper over hints of a decline in knowledge. In 1989, the report notes, 74 percent of Americans were able to identify Dan Quayle, as lightweight a vice-president as has held the office in modern times. Today, just 69 percent of those polled could name Dick Cheney, arguably the most powerful vice-president in American history and a man, civil libertarians would argue, who has consistently consolidated power in the executive branch, often at the expense of constitutionally guaranteed checks and balances. In 1989, some 47 percent could identify the president of Russia. Today 36 percent can.

Are Americans, faced with an unending assault of screaming pundits, simply checking out?

Or are they so consumed by wall-to-wall news coverage of exploitative stories such as the death of Anna Nicole Smith that they haven’t looked up from their screens long enough to notice the rights of our democracy eroding around them?

In either case, the news media must shoulder a significant portion of the blame: The evidence suggests to me that all-noise, all-the-time helps undermine America’s security and democracy.

* When cable and network news ignore most of the world and sanitize much of the death and mayhem in Iraq, Americans lose the capacity to understand why and how deeply the rest of the world, including our allies, doesn’t like us. And that’s dangerous. (The topic was explored this morning here as part of a documentary — on the BBC.)

* When the cable and broadcast networks salivate endlessly over the sensational, whether it is the sad but trivial such as Smith’s death or the serious, devastating but ultimately distracting, such as the Virginia Tech mayhem, Americans lose sight of the myriad ways the Bush administration has eroded civil liberties, from the politicized firings of its own appointees to the Justice Department to the elimination of habeas corpus for foreign nationals picked up under the Military Commissions Act. (Or, as Jonathan Evans, a conservative British member of parliament, said on that same BBC special, it is essential in hunting terrorists that we “maintain our belief in democracy and human rights.”)

* And when journalists compensate for lack of original reporting by simply putting on loud-talking representatives of opposing viewpoints, they obscure the facts and blur the truth.
There is considerable evidence that Karl Rove and the Bush Administration have long known how to exploit this. One of my favorite examples, reported by Ron Susskind in the October 2004 New York Times magazine, is of an exchange he had with a “senior adviser” to the president. That adviser sneered at what he called the “reality-based community” represented by Susskind and his questions.

”That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he reportedly told Susskind. ”We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.”

Yet instead of pointing out just how illusory this “reality” continues to be, the media even today give the administration and its representatives ample and equal time to voice it. One repeated example is the platform that Dick Cheney still gets with regularity to assert that Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda had close ties before the Iraq War. Never mind that top-level government reports, from that of the 9/11 Commission to leaked CIA documents, have consistently discredited this repeated assertion.

We live in a world of point-counterpoint, shout-countershout. It’s the format in which all-noise, all-the-time feels most comfortable. And like the Bush Administration, it creates its own reality, a world of talking heads and wagging fingers, too often, I fear, to quote the great bard, “Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing.”


Blogger Frank W said...


I share your disenchantment with the shout-countershout format of “discourse,” but I think you’re letting the consumer off too easily. If half your students can’t find Albania, Nigeria or Vietnam on a map, blame not the media, but rather their fifth grade geography teachers – or, more to the point, their parents. Intellectual curiosity doesn’t come from television. It comes from the home and is fostered in school. If the majority of consumers have grown up less interested in good government and more interested with celebrities or mass shootings, you can’t blame the media (which, after all, are businesses) for capitalizing on that fact.

Also, there are plenty of media outlets in the U.S. who are doing terrific work in covering the rest of the world, as well as keeping watch on the government at home. PBS’ “Frontline” and “NOW with David Brancaccio” come to mind. It’s all there for the taking at the simple click of a button.

Nick Gillespie had an excellent essay in the Los Angeles Times last week about a recent FCC report that suggests the agency take a more proactive approach to regulating content in the interest of promoting “family-friendly, uplifting and nonviolent programming.” My favorite line: “It's safe to say that when a quartet of do-gooder, pizza-chomping cartoon reptiles has become a predicate for federal regulation, American governance has gone seriously off the rails.”

There is a parallel to your point. Whether it’s the entertainment they watch or the news they digest, the consumer has a responsibility to decide what’s most important to them. No one is hiding what’s going on in the real world from them (particularly with the Internet – who’d have thought twenty-five years ago that one day a housewife in Elkhorn, Nebraska could peruse the South China Morning Post at 3 in the morning if she so chose?). But you can’t shove it down their throats either.

10:27 AM  
Blogger Frank W said...

I screwed up the link. This should work.

10:31 AM  
Blogger Xiaozhengmm 123 said...

2015-7-23 xiaozhengm
christian louboutin sale
sac longchamp
coach outlet online
true religion sale
pandora jewelry
air max shoes
ray ban uk
ed hardy clothing
ray ban sunglasses
ray ban sunglasses
michael kors
burberry handbags
pandora outlet
ed hardy
michael kors
cheap jordans
michael kors handbag
mcm outlet
jordan shoes
coach outlet
cheap beats
ralph lauren
tory burch outlet
pandora rings
kate spade handbags
replica watches cheap
cheap beats headphones
mcm handbags
cheap oakleys
prada handbags
nike blazer low
true religion outlet
michael kors outlet
kate spade
longchamp soldes
michael kors bag
polo ralph lauren outlet
pandora charms 2015
burberry scarf

10:24 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

oakley sunglasses, longchamp outlet, nike free, burberry, tiffany and co, nike air max, louis vuitton outlet, prada outlet, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet, ugg boots, louboutin, chanel handbags, ugg boots, louboutin shoes, tiffany jewelry, christian louboutin outlet, louboutin outlet, louis vuitton, ray ban sunglasses, uggs on sale, nike outlet, nike air max, cheap oakley sunglasses, tory burch outlet, louis vuitton, polo ralph lauren outlet, jordan shoes, kate spade outlet, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, michael kors, replica watches, ray ban sunglasses, polo ralph lauren outlet, ugg boots, ugg boots, burberry outlet online, replica watches, michael kors outlet, longchamp outlet, gucci outlet, prada handbags, ray ban sunglasses, oakley sunglasses, longchamp, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet

6:35 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

coach outlet, nike roshe run, hollister pas cher, air force, air max, ray ban uk, mulberry, nike air max, michael kors, sac guess, lacoste pas cher, timberland, sac longchamp, hogan, michael kors, hermes, nike air max, true religion jeans, abercrombie and fitch, kate spade handbags, new balance pas cher, coach outlet, ray ban pas cher, nike free, burberry, hollister, true religion jeans, vanessa bruno, true religion jeans, ralph lauren pas cher, tn pas cher, air jordan pas cher, ralph lauren uk, nike roshe, michael kors, converse pas cher, lululemon, vans pas cher, true religion outlet, nike air max, north face, oakley pas cher, coach factory outlet, louboutin pas cher, nike blazer, longchamp pas cher, nike free run uk, north face, michael kors, coach purses

6:37 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

mac cosmetics, gucci, abercrombie and fitch, beats by dre, instyler, longchamp, p90x workout, nfl jerseys, jimmy choo shoes, nike trainers, insanity workout, bottega veneta, hollister, asics running shoes, hollister, north face outlet, babyliss, vans, reebok shoes, ray ban, nike air max, valentino shoes, timberland boots, birkin bag, louboutin, ghd, soccer shoes, converse outlet, wedding dresses, baseball bats, mont blanc, vans shoes, mcm handbags, ferragamo shoes, oakley, celine handbags, giuseppe zanotti, lululemon, chi flat iron, new balance, converse, nike huarache, herve leger, iphone 6 cases, north face outlet, hollister, nike roshe, nike air max, ralph lauren, soccer jerseys

6:40 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

pandora jewelry, canada goose, moncler, supra shoes, louis vuitton, moncler outlet, louis vuitton, sac louis vuitton pas cher, replica watches, lancel, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, juicy couture outlet, michael kors outlet, moncler, louis vuitton, karen millen, hollister, toms shoes, canada goose uk, swarovski, barbour jackets, barbour, canada goose outlet, moncler, ugg pas cher, michael kors handbags, moncler, pandora jewelry, doudoune canada goose, canada goose outlet, bottes ugg, marc jacobs, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, michael kors outlet online, wedding dresses, swarovski crystal, canada goose, moncler, canada goose, moncler, moncler, thomas sabo, montre pas cher, louis vuitton, links of london, ugg boots uk, pandora charms, pandora charms, doke gabbana outlet, juicy couture outlet, coach outlet, canada goose

6:42 PM  
Blogger Mie Helal said...

Thank you for sharing

3:28 AM  
Blogger soma taha said...

12:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home